Share
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Using Helium for Aluminum Wheel Repair (jakeru's #19)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greater Seattle, WA
    Posts
    813

    Default Using Helium for Aluminum Wheel Repair (jakeru's #19)

    I got a new welding toy to play with... a bottle of Helium! (Old 155cf Argon, meet your new pal: 330cf Helium!)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0005.jpg 
Views:	971 
Size:	134.8 KB 
ID:	3021 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0004.jpg 
Views:	1778 
Size:	144.5 KB 
ID:	3022

    I found the tank on craigslist as basically an empty tank for $100, and it came with a balloon filling gauge/regulator. I then got the tank filled (exchanged) from my local welding supply for another $120 out the door.

    I was hoping to be able to mix the helium and argon with a "Y", but I measured one of my regulators puts out 30 psi and another puts out 50 psi, (so I think that might not work too well.)

    This aluminum wheel will be my first experiment (and also a paid welding job) where I will try the Helium. The outer wheel lip was previously repaired with bondo/body filler, which cracked out when a tire was being mounted, a poor repair solution. I hammered and ground it all out (and I even found an extra "hidden pocket" of the stuff! Tapping with a hammer, the filler sounds dull compared to the sharp metallic ring of aluminum), and prepped it down to fresh aluminum surfaces with a flap wheel.
    Before prep:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0007.jpg 
Views:	627 
Size:	138.7 KB 
ID:	3024 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0006.jpg 
Views:	628 
Size:	135.4 KB 
ID:	3023
    After prep:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0013.jpg 
Views:	618 
Size:	136.7 KB 
ID:	3020

    For the Helium test, I set up everything up for welding just as I would if I were using Argon: 3/32" 1.5% lanthanated tungsten (sharpened with blunted tip), 20%EP (AC mode), and footpedal for current control (with full machine output of 200 amps current at wide pedal down.) And I used a #6 stubby gas lens with 15 cfh gas flow.

    First thing I noticed when starting the pre-flow, was the floating ball in the regulator floats up and down with some more "springiness" in Helium than it does with Argon. And the sound of the Helium coming out of the torch even sounds different (quieter) than argon.

    The arc through Helium was definitely harder to start than it was through Argon. (I was thinking, it was good that I was using a lanthanated electrode and not pure or zirconiated, which tend to be even more difficult to start!) I was really amazed how I had an instant puddle on the cold aluminum wheel, even with very light current. The footpedal position that what would have just "etched" the surface with cleaning action on Argon, actually left a 3/16-1/4" wide swath of melted metal surface on Helium! So with Helium, it wasn't possible to just "etch" the surface, it was melted aluminum surface, or nothing at all. (Crazy stuff!) I don't think I ever floored the machine; it felt like I did most of the welding at 20%-40% pedal depression. I have a feeling I would have been running double the current or more if I was using Argon and may have perhaps floored it, at least at the start.

    Anyhow, I was getting some black "smut" on the outer edges of my weld area I haven't figured out yet, but I think it's because the lightweight Helium shielding gas is doing a 180 degree turn out of the cup and floating upwards. I'll have to try pumping up the cfh and see if it cleans up the dirtiness next time. Amazingly, it wasn't anything that posed any problems welding over - I was able to melt through it effortlessly with a new puddle. It did just look a little bit like hell. (No problem on this application, all the surface will be getting ground off anyway.) The surface of the puddle however looked bright and shiny under the arc - no oxides floating on the surface were noted.

    After some grinding (because I got a little filler rod feeding happy on the first pass ), I did a second welding pass to further fill in and 'touch up' any low spots. I also noted that the aluminum deposited in the first pass I ground down, was totally solid and free of porosity and inclusions (a good thing!). And after the second weld pass I'll say, it's ready to go back to my wheel repair customer for them to further work over. (They will further grind/smooth, straighten as needed, and paint.)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0015.jpg 
Views:	629 
Size:	124.7 KB 
ID:	3018 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0016.jpg 
Views:	793 
Size:	133.4 KB 
ID:	3017

    I think I'd like to do some more scientific back to back tests of He vs Ar... I need to work out a way to mix them in various ratios, I'm thinking.
    Last edited by jakeru; 07-29-2011 at 06:39 PM.
    '13 Everlast 255EXT
    '07 Everlast Super200P

  2. #2

    Default

    I'm glad to see you are finally getting to experiment with helium, Jake. I know you have been itching to try it for a while. A few months ago at my old shop, they ordered up two huge bottles of helium to fill balloons for a promotion they were having. In my typical "I'll ask for forgiveness later" manor, I was able to requisition said bottle of helium and give it a go. My experience was similar. Very quick puddle formation, difficult arc start, and lot of sooty ickyness deposits. This was unmixed helium as well. From what I can gather using pure helium just kind of naturally looks dirtier than with argon.

    I work at a different shop now, (not related) and we do custom builds and restorations that sell for upwards of a quarter mil on the high end, low 120s on the low end. I order a lot of custom fabbed parts and on some of them I have noticed that there is an identical black residue left in some of the nooks and crannies of the parts. I believe cleaning the parts after welding is how the make the helium work look so good. I would like to try a mix. I bet it would be a lot cleaner and soften the arc starts. Keep us updated.
    Everlast PP256
    Everlast Imig 205
    HF 90 am inverter tig
    Scopes, Scanners, Meters

  3. #3

    Default

    you can use balloon helium? I was told you need ultra pure helium and its $$$
    sold my miller mig
    got a PT250EX
    saving up for a plasma cutter

  4. #4

    Default

    I guess it takes a trained eye to notice the difference between Helium, & argon...... Ive used both & simple cant tell any difference... Either way your welds look good, & it looks like you got good penetration.....*****
    As a man thinketh, so shall he be.

  5. #5

    Default

    Check out "weldingtipsandtricks.com" for setting up a "Y" mix for Ar & He. Make sure to use check valves in each line between the regulator and the "Y". He needs a higher flow rate.
    Lincoln Weld-Pak 100 (C-25 or CO2 Shield)
    Victor Oxy-Act
    Lincoln AC225 Tombstone
    Everlast 250EX & W300 Cooler

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greater Seattle, WA
    Posts
    813

    Default

    Wrenchtamer - That's interesting about you noticing the black smut also after experimenting with TIG welding helium. I have a few ideas what could be causing it at this point, and hope to get to the bottom of it eventually.

    One thing I did with the helium was, I filled a small balloon with it. I found it pretty eye opening how readily that Helium balloon wanted to float (and how fast it would rise when I let it go!)

    I wonder what ratio I'd need to mix (He%/Ar%) to get a gas that would have "neutral buoyancy" in air? (Neither sink nor float?) If anyone is inclined in calculating such Chemistry related things, your help would be appreciated. (I remember kind of glossing over things like "moles" and such being discussed in my high school chemistry classes, and I didn't take any chemistry in college.) I also wonder if welding with this "neutral buoyancy" shielding gas mix, may be able to use an even lower flow rate (for good shielding) than pure argon. IE: gas stays where you flow it, rather than floating away OR sinking.

    FYI, I didn't spring for the "ultra high purity / lab testing" Helium tank. My welding supply manager recommended against it, due to an extra $40 per bottle and he claimed it wouldn't be necessary. I've also ready differing opinions about whether its helpful or necessary for welding. Although it's good to know he did have it, (and even right there in stock!)

    I determined last night that both of my regulators/flowmeters actually have about the same outlet pressure, of ~50 psi. (The false, 30psi read I took on one the other day was because I had it hooked up to a nearly empty argon bottle, which must have only had only about that much pressure in it!) Time for an argon bottle refill. (And do you want to know something I really like about my local welding supplier? ...open on Saturdays! )

    bigjoe - I've e-mailed Jody about the He/Ar mixing, regulator outlet pressures, and check valves. He agrees that the check valves probably aren't necessary if the two regulators have the same outlet pressures. (They do seem like nice things to have though, because in case one tank gets empty, the check valve will prevent the other gas from potentially leaking out and into the other tank. I did just have my flowmeter/regulators taken apart last night, and will need to do some pondering on how this might happen.)

    --Edit---
    I just took a crack at the "neutral buoyancy" He/Ar mix calculation. I found some simple, "pounds per cubic foot" density numbers in the He/Ar MSDS datasheets (http://www.centralwelding.com/MSDS-P...ld%201,2,3.pdf)
    Ar = .103 lbs/cuft (at 21.1C / 70F)
    He = .0103 lbs/cuft (at 21.2C / 70F)

    ...and I also found a density from Wikipedia for air (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_of_air) for a similar temperature/pressure
    1.2041 Kg/cubic meter (at 20C / 71F)
    = .079825 lbs/cuft

    Then it's just solving "X" for the equation,
    Helium + Argon = .0705169 lbs/cubic
    x*.0103 + (1-x)*.103 = .075169
    and I got x = .3, or 30%.

    So, the mixture of Helium and Argon that would in theory give neutral buoyancy in air (and would possibly neither rise nor fall after exiting the TIG torch cup) would be 30% Helium / 70% argon.
    Last edited by jakeru; 07-30-2011 at 08:39 PM.
    '13 Everlast 255EXT
    '07 Everlast Super200P

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,323

    Default

    Seems like the 30% He / 70% Ar mix would result in neutral buoyancy in a balloon or similar contained space... but witrhout containment, don't those weights suggest the argon
    would displace the air, and the helium would rise quickly?
    DaveO
    Oxweld oxy acet gear
    IMIG 200
    PowerTIG 210 EXT... Amazing!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greater Seattle, WA
    Posts
    813

    Default

    Dave, I think there may be forces at play that keep mixed gasses mixed and not let them separate out immediately (at least to some degree.)

    If the components in air separated out very quickly/readily, wouldn't we only get to breathe the densest contents (IE: argon) down at sea level? Anyhow, my neutral buoyancy theory should be something that I might be able to test. Here is something I just noticed - ck worldwide's guide to shielding gas flows recommendation chart, says 30% or less Helium (/Argon) mixes can use the same flow rate as for pure Argon:
    http://www.ckworldwide.com/tech-3.pdf
    (Kind of interesting they picked 30% as the cutoff point...)

    I'm excited because I'm up and running with not only a fresh argon bottle, but I also now have a "Y" setup. I've tried it so far, just flowing gas out of the torch (haven't done any arc tests yet), and so far so good. Both floating balls respond instantly when the gas solenoid opens, and adjusting one of the gas flows does not impact the flowrate of the other - perfect. I incorporated 1/4" NPT fittings into the "Y" connection, so I may be able to add checkvalves on later if desired. I put a standard outlet fitting (5/8-18 flare I believe) on the outlet of the "Y", so I can connect the same hose that connects direct to a regulator to the outlet of the "Y" (or back the other direction) as needed. (This was easier said than done... I had to weld two brass fittings together to make it happen!) Good stuff.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0061.jpg 
Views:	524 
Size:	140.8 KB 
ID:	3071 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0062.jpg 
Views:	513 
Size:	144.7 KB 
ID:	3070

    Edit: I just did some quick tests on various He/Ar mixes, run back to back. 0% He, 33% He, 66% He, 100% He, then repeated the sequence again, and a few other things. Just small 1" long beads run on 1/16" flat stock with 1/16" filler rod. I found something interesting only on the pure (100%) He, the glow of the arc was actually red in the middle, just off the tungsten. Around the red glowing zone, it had the normal green glow. On all other mixes, the arc didn't have the red glow at all, it was only the usual green. (This is though my auto-darkening lens, of course.) Pretty cool.

    I did all my test with 20% EP (minimum AC Balance my machine goes to), and it seems the 33%-66% He mixes could be useful in reducing the ethed zone while still providing some necessary cleaning. The 100% He had oxides in the puddle and a "crazed" cathodic etch pattern in the surfaces around the weld bead. I used 15 total cfh for most of the tests, but I did try boosting the cfh with heavy He concentrations to improve cleaning (I think I boosted it to 20cfh, which didn't seem to do much; maybe I need to boost to something crazier, like 30cfh.) This is with a #5, non-gas lens cup. I wasn't finding any evidence of smut or soot (of any kind) on any of these tests. I'm really glad I have the ability to vary the mix, and didn't get a pre-mixed bottle, this is cool. Oh yeah back to back going from He mixes back to pure argon, definite increase in the amount of foot pedal depression to get a puddle. I was using a 1/16" tungsten.

    There is a definite difference in noise of the He vs the Ar (as well as any major change in the relative mix) coming out of the TIG torch cup. In fact, after I vary the mix, I can hear it when the new gas mix starts making its way out of the TIG torch. (Doesn't take long for the new mix to get to the cup, about 2 seconds with my setup, I'd say.) Different noise the gases make "whistling" or "hissing" out of the cup, (or through the orifices in the collet body, perhaps.)
    Last edited by jakeru; 07-31-2011 at 07:49 AM.
    '13 Everlast 255EXT
    '07 Everlast Super200P

  9. #9

    Default

    Hey Jake,

    Any finished pictures after grind and polish? Or did you hand it off and say "there ya go".
    Mike R.
    Email: admineverlast@everlastwelders.com
    www.everlastgenerators.com
    www.everlastwelders.com
    877-755-9353 x203
    M-F 12 - 7PM PST
    FYI: PP50, PP80, IMIG-200, IMIG-250P, 210EXT and 255EXT.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greater Seattle, WA
    Posts
    813

    Default

    The customer is a professional wheel repair company, (and they are very skilled at grinding, straightening, and painting), so when doing welding jobs for them I worry about: leaving no low spots, leaving no stress risers (especially if it is likely that they will be bending them straight afterwards, as they usually do this immediately after receiving my welded wheels before and grinding), and leaving no porosity in any weld deposit. I don't need to worry about grinding, polishing, and painting, as this is what they do (and they do it really well; you usually can't even tell the wheel was worked on after they are done with it.) I'm pretty happy with the arrangement.

    I have done some final grinding/polishing on wheels but they are usually one-off projects for friends, and for some reason I seem to never take pictures of those projects. I did one for my brother about a week or two ago, it was an old bare polished aluminum wheel for a 1960's Chevy van. (They call them "mag" wheels but they were really aluminum.) Reconstructed the inner wheel lip where it was broken off. Ground the welded bead down with a flap wheel using a light touch and taking my time. No paint. Oh, we did do some "hot bending" with a weed burner and a big hammer on the wheel lip beforehand on that wheel too.

    Just last night, I ground some "curbage" out of the outer wheel lip of a painted cast wheel for a friend. (Purely for cosmetic reasons.) He had selected and tested a spray paint that was a near perfect color match, he was going to shoot over it. Didn't get any pics of that one either.
    '13 Everlast 255EXT
    '07 Everlast Super200P

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    The Boonies of Texas
    Posts
    420

    Default

    I am mixing argon and c02 for my mig welding. I can't see the need to buy a separate setup when I have the pure products on hand. I may try some O2 in the mix since some of the mig gasses are a tri-mix for stainless and regular low alloy steel.

    Thurmond
    Miller Bobcat 3 Phase,
    Miller Suitcase X-Treme 12VS wire feeder for the Bobcat with M-25 300A .045" gun / Bernard 400A 5/64" wire mig gun .
    26 series gas cooled TIG torch, setup for quick connect to Bobcat.
    17 series gas cooled Tig Torch for Low Amp Solar Tig (Direct Solar Panel Powered Tig welding)
    Hobart Handler 187 Mig / Fluxcore
    EVERLAST PowerUltra 205P
    EVERLAST PowerTig 250 EXT 2013 Model

  12. #12

    Default

    Jake,

    Just baiting for more pictures.

    I know the friend projects. God do I know them.

    Maybe they can show the final repair? Or you can cop a picture.

    You might want to explain MAG welding too.
    Mike R.
    Email: admineverlast@everlastwelders.com
    www.everlastgenerators.com
    www.everlastwelders.com
    877-755-9353 x203
    M-F 12 - 7PM PST
    FYI: PP50, PP80, IMIG-200, IMIG-250P, 210EXT and 255EXT.

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tritium View Post
    I am mixing argon and c02 for my mig welding. I can't see the need to buy a separate setup when I have the pure products on hand. I may try some O2 in the mix since some of the mig gasses are a tri-mix for stainless and regular low alloy steel.

    Thurmond
    Order some C18 or C25 for MIG. I would not bother mixing unless you are doing TIG on aluminum.
    Mike R.
    Email: admineverlast@everlastwelders.com
    www.everlastgenerators.com
    www.everlastwelders.com
    877-755-9353 x203
    M-F 12 - 7PM PST
    FYI: PP50, PP80, IMIG-200, IMIG-250P, 210EXT and 255EXT.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greater Seattle, WA
    Posts
    813

    Default

    Something remarkable I've discovered with the helium mix, at least at high penetration AC Balance settings (80% EN), is that it seems to take a lot of heat off the tungsten compared to using the same current with pure argon.

    Check out the pictures below. This was a crack repair of a .6" thick lip of an aluminum, automotive wheel, which is about the thickest wheel lip I have seen in such an application. It was also a 20"x9" wheel, and further stored in below freezing shop, so pretty big heat sink that needed a lot of heat to weld... 200 amps sustained for several seconds at a time, to be precise. I did grind a vee with a carbide burr on both sides and weld both sides, as was necessary to pull this off with full penetration with anywhere near of as narrow of a weld bead as is shown.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0134.jpg 
Views:	539 
Size:	122.8 KB 
ID:	4672

    I used the same helium mix I have been using for a few months now for a lot of my aluminum, which is, in the general ballpark mix of about 25% He. But get this... I did this with a 1/16" tungsten! Sorry I didn't take a before pic, but it started out as a truncated point, like a crayon shape. It is a 2% lanthanated. Here is what it looked like after:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0138.jpg 
Views:	971 
Size:	133.7 KB 
ID:	4671

    It's got some "multiple protrusions", (so is definitely pushing the current limits on it without balling it), but, what's amazing to me is, how the tip didn't melt right off and drop into the aluminum puddle, or even completely "ball" at this current level! I am almost certain if I were using pure argon at 200 amps sustained for several seconds, it would have melted at least a pretty nice sized ball, and maybe even dripped the molten tungsten tip right off. What do you guys think?

    So, putting aside the benefits of the extra and penetration per amp that Helium allows, it seems like there is an additional benefit, that it allows you to run a smaller tungsten (providing further more focused, controllable, and penetrating heat on thick materials.)

    End result: the crack in the .6" thick wheel, I was able to repair with full penetration (from both sides) with the Helium mix and a 1/16" tungsten, with a measured bead width of only .35", (that's just a little bit over half the thickness of the material) without really even trying that hard. I don't think that would have been possible with pure argon.

    (Now in hindsight, I could have further turned up the He% to try further increasing heat per amp, and probably welded this without even needing 200 amps, but I wanted to try this thick wheel with my "usual mix" to see how the tungsten would hold.)
    '13 Everlast 255EXT
    '07 Everlast Super200P

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Fridley, Minnesota
    Posts
    376

    Default

    Note to self "get some helium"
    "It's not magic it's experimental, kind of like washing your hands after pooping used to be." -House

    Everlast PowerTig 250EX-arrived 1-26-2012
    Everlast PowerCool W300-arrived 1-26-2012
    Everlast PowerTig 185 Micro-arrived 1-26-2012
    Everlast PowerPlasma 70-arrived 1-26-2012
    ESAB MigMaster 250-borrowed
    HyperTherm 151 AKA "The Light Sabre"
    Linde UCC-305-964 lb. of old time water cooled TIG love-SOLD-Bad MOJO
    Purox OXY/ACETYLENE

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greater Seattle, WA
    Posts
    813

    Default

    I ran out of argon tonight, and to get a project done (aluminum) I tried cranking up the Helium and just running pure (100%) Helium. The red arc, black "soot" nastiness came back, and then in between weld beads, I was also reminded about the hard arc starts. I had to really push down on the pedal quite a bit, even with the 1/16" tungsten to get the arc to start. (although the tip was about as blunt as can be )

    I don't know what's up with all that, but a mix of a little Helium, with a lot of Argon is definitely where my welding setup is happiest at the moment.

    I will continue to mix my own He/Ar mix, because it seems to be the most economical to do it that way. Plus, I have a much easier time refilling my smaller (155cf) Argon bottle than my larger 330cf Helium bottle, due to it being easier to transport for me. I am down to about 1500 psi on the Helium bottle - I think it started at about 2500psi, so I've used up 40% of it so far.
    Last edited by jakeru; 02-02-2012 at 08:35 AM.
    '13 Everlast 255EXT
    '07 Everlast Super200P

  17. #17

    Default

    After 80% helium or so you lose arc stability. You can weld 100% helium they do it when they tig weld thick copper but it isn't alot of fun. After all it is heliarc.
    Everlast PowerTig 250EX
    Everlast PowerCool 300
    Everlast PowerPlasma 70
    Lincoln Powermig 215
    Magnum SG Spool Gun
    Don't jump on my Gomba

Similar Threads

  1. Aluminum wheel crack repair
    By jakeru in forum Welding Repairs
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-18-2013, 11:46 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-03-2011, 04:50 PM
  3. Project 15 from d3javoodoo % Aluminum Wheel repair #2 %
    By Legacyartist247 in forum Welding Repairs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-30-2011, 10:43 PM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-02-2011, 08:10 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-02-2011, 06:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •