Originally Posted by
Martine
I really appreciate your taking the time to explain arc force - especially as my inverter is not an Everlast one.
I had another look at my inverter's arc force in operation; I watched the Amps Out readout whilst laying a bead with a 6013, and, in my case, the welding amps is exactly determined by the % arc force. So with 75A set, the Amps Out reads a rock-solid 75A unless and until arc force kicks in wherein it jumps instantly to 150A at 100% arc force (and 131A at 75% arc force). And then, an instant later it drops back to 75A as the arc force has done its stuff and caused the arc voltage to rise above the threshold (20V?) at which arc force kicks in.
Do you think the next generation of inverters will have true adjustment of the Volt-Amps curve characteristic, where the slope/shape of the curve would be truly adjustable, from what it is now, a vertical line (constant amps) to a genuinely drooping/sloping curve? Arc force (on my inverter) effectively is an instantaneous jump from one vertical, constant-current line to another one to the right and back again a fraction of a second later, whereas to truly mimic the transformer-rectifier, you would have a downward sloping/drooping line where a decrease in arc volts (shorter arc) would bring about a proportional, smooth and lasting increase in current, and not just at one point on the curve (the threshold voltage). At present, on my machine at least, arc force is a pulse of increased current, whereas in an ideal world you'd have a smoothly increasing current over a range of falling voltage. Of course, it may well be that my inverter's arc force circuitry is fairly basic and not representative of arc force in more advanced inverters out there, certainly, that Miller article makes me think that might be the case.
Given that I believe it's only with cellulosics that you want a sloping curve, all other rods are fine with vertical, constant current curves, you wouldn't necessarily need an adjustable volts-amps curve, just a switch to select the cellulosic characteristic.
Once again, many thanks for your kind input.
Martin